Posts Tagged ‘Obama?’

Federal Judge David O. Carter and the release of "Keyes v. Obama"

December 19, 2009

A dark ominous cloud of judicial impropriety looms over the U.S. federal system. The darkest of these steep cloud formation is that which hangs over the Central District of California, in the wake of U.S. District Judge David O. s Carter "provocative decision to dismiss the case," Keyes v. Obama, "which informs a majority of the companies concerned and the American electorate as essential to enable a determination of whether Barack H. Obama aka Barry Soetoroconstitutionally entitled to continue as President of the United States.

I wonder what actually went into the heads of the 64-year-old federal judge, U.S. President Bill Clinton appointed in 1998, after he had decided to declared the beginning of November this year that the prosecution's case was crucial to the determination of a constitutional Obama basic eligibility criteria as a natural born citizen of the United States, that is, whether he actually born in the U.S. state of Hawaii or in Mombasa, Kenya, Africa.As a former Marine Corps officer to fight in Vietnam, Carter has a story, a stand-up lawyer, and his statement that "soldiers, marines, airmen, sailors and sent to be safe in Harm's Way in Iraq and Afghanistan that the President ordered them into battle is considered to hold office and issue such orders, "gives a painful necessity, the questions of substance," Keyes v. Obama "in a quick and legally responsible manner.

Then came the U.S. Department of Justicebetween false in a completely non-governmental capacity, for Obama to dismiss with U.S. tax dollars, a petition to Judge Carter, the complaint in the same way that eight judicial colleagues Carter since shortly after Obama's nomination in 2008 done shortly after the first federal complaint was filed against the man. I wonder what did Judge Carter when he spoke of USDOJ lawyers, judges, who decide the authority and responsibility to call into question whether Obama intimidatedwas guilty of duplicity and fraud, and whether the president should be dubious position as chief executive of the United States, if at fault. This of course was governed only by Carter was that a trial would begin on the merits of the application in January 2010, but even then, Carter had refused to dismiss the action, and many Americans believed that he would continue with the process. But, said Carter, a dismissal, and after extensive research in the further course of events, I have found itreasonable suspicion that Judge Carter was probably the unfortunate recipient some threatening, well-worded phone calls and e-mails from fraudulent politicians who wanted to see the case dismissed. What's that you say that this is pure speculation?

Well, let's get down fundamental reality, sad story is repeated often, as such corruption was politically constructed quite often during the 20th Century American government, and bad thingsoften good people what has happened, by cunning, who sought to ensure their own risk, that justice prevailed. Just within the last five years, Stanley R. Hilton, an eminent scholar and noted lawyer in San Francisco, representing more than a hundred 9 / Families 11 victims in one trial, he filed against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and others of the Bush administration, for complicity and direct involvement in the 9 / 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Shortly afterThe suit was filed, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, San Francisco, ordered Hilton to the action, which he refused to do, to drop. Subsequently, then began a series of secret invasion of Hilton San Francisco law firms as a result of the theft and destruction of the material is a vital link between Bush, Cheney and others, the 9 / 11 attacks. Finally, if unable to reach Illston Hilton, falling action, they just dismissed the case on grounds of "sovereign immunity"explain, in essence, that a president can do anything during his term of office, commit mass murder, and doing it are civil and criminal impunity. Further away, the lengths to go to corrupt politicians to ensure that their cunning tricks are to be implemented well documented. When a U.S. Navy commander with a guilty conscience occurred in February 1968 to testify before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing that was the Gulf of Tonkin incident is not what it wasoriginally reported by the Pentagon to handle the massive escallation of ground troops in Vietnam is warranted in 1965 discovered, Senator J. William Fulbright, that was the honorable naval officer, adopted by clumsy at CIA secret agent in the White House and committed involuntarily to a psychiatric Department for several weeks. "

Perhaps Judge David O. Carter, with his brilliant Rhodes Scholar-level spirit seriously considered Susan Illston The Demon precedental submitted,Perhaps the perceived intimidation of the DOJ and regarded them as potentially threatening.

In the historical records, there were quite a few German judges, in my previous ezine essay that mentioned abandoned during the years leading up to the devastating dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, either stepped out of their positions or their judicial ethics and judicial member of the NSDAP when they learned of the SS and the Gestapo, that the earlier worshiped Weimar Constitutionwas no longer law, and the Nazi-ruled the law. In fact, there were more than just a couple of German judges who ruled on the side with the Nazis, about the threat of death.

But there is one other outstanding matter in this quasi-examine legal battle. All American trial judges, federal and state authorities, worried about their decisions will be finally lifted on the basis of the law by appellate courts. If the errors are based entirely on legislation, allegedly by trial judges, made the appeal courtsare there to remand to the right as to the trial court again for a correction of the errors. However, Judge Carter probably realized artificially political machinations surrounding "Keyes v. Obama," and that a decision by him to order Barack Obama to his original Hawaiian birth certificate and other records as yet unknown, counsel for the plaintiff is requested, even if correct, would automatically conversely, on a completely political basis by a federal appeals court. Though the factsand merits of the case law of the plaintiff could have made it clear that Barack Obama acted fraudulently H. in a deliberate manner to conceal the truth about his birth, by the cost of about 1.5 million dollars in legal expenses by Production of a 12 dollar certified copy to be kept to the original long-form birth certificate, would never have allowed the case to go to court.

What is the real cause of the unfortunate dismissal of whether Judge David O. Carter on the affectedperceived threat, or is just the absolute absurdity of the proceedings before court mainly realized by the case, another example of a President (this time of concern selected) will be created over the law. When I think of the great John Adams, Lawyer, patriot and second U.S. President, testified before the Massachusetts Assembly that the United States a nation of laws and not of men, I am deeply shocked by the appalling Machiavelli politicization of basic justice nowwidespread in the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the federal government. It seems that the American Republic is no longer, in the form and content of what it was ten-or-more before the turn of the 20th Century, and that came in this nation, the once great Constitutional Republic could be accompanied by a sad point of no return from a mutant form of government destructive to the ends of the Constitution of the United States.

Who is Barack Obama? Part 1

November 13, 2009

He was the bona fide golden child of a party desperately need a winner. In many ways, the history and rise of Barack Obama is a uniquely American story of the 21 Century and the most interesting chapter is just beginning. A graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, Obama worked as an organizer, university professor and civil rights lawyer before for public office and serve in the Senate of Illinois from 1997 to 2004. He was elected to the U.S. …