Posts Tagged ‘Language:’

Book Review on War of Words – Language, Politics and 9-11

December 23, 2009

• Book details:

Author: Sandra Silberstein

Paperback: 197

Publisher: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group

Place of Publication: London

Publication Year: 2002

Language: English

ASIN: B000OT8284

Price: USD $ 22.95

• About the author:

Sandra Silberstein is Professor of English at the University of Washington, Seattle. So far it has on women and language, the choice of reading and technology and focusedResources in teaching reading through most of their books.

• Book Analysis:

The book "War of Words" is 197 pages long, divided into 8 chapters. The introduction to the first part of the book is a comprehensive summary attached an entire book in three pages.

This book can be recommended to all whose interests are in linguistics, even those who are not experts in this matter.

Sandra Silberstein focuses on the creation of nationalTransformations, including changes in American national identity and belief in post-9/11 by illustrating some examples of the situation in the U.S. is a time of crisis point after 9 / 11 events.

the author does not go deeply into the details of the field of linguistics, and to declare they do not, as is evident in linguistics to the many records she has cited can be used to convince, but the sentences and examples of readers to continue his reading,End.

Sandra Silberstein noted in her book "A War of Words: Language, Politics and 9 / 11" to the speeches of George W. Bush in the post-9/11 only because of linguistic analysis, so it is difficult to determine their political tendency, . She tries to focus more on the words created national transformations and the new American identity in post-9/11 when everything happened. As a result, Silberstein focuses on the representation of the terrorist attacks in the speeches of the President, MediaTexts and eyewitness accounts

The most interesting part of the book is in my opinion the coverage, the implementation of many important meanings and messages. For example, a sentence means in Persian about the image of two Afghans, that Iran is a supporter of terrorism.

"It is important to consider the diction of the special atmosphere surrounding the consequences, like Sandra Silberstein, in her book" A War of Words: Language, Politics and 9 / 11 (Routledge, 2002)

The initial rhetoricArea 9 / 11 was comforting to law, allowing Americans to heal. President Bush's reassuring words were Silberstein of the words of President Roosevelt in comparison to lay on Pearl Harbor in 1941. The exercise of trying to create is both a necessity and urgency. For example, Bush said the war on terrorism: "These measures are important. But the only way to defeat, terrorism as a threat to our way of life is to stop it, eliminate it and destroy it where it grows . He was inEffect lasts for a war rally, just as Roosevelt said in 1941: "… I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense. I believe I interpret the will of the people … when I say that we do not defend us only to the limit, but will ensure that this form of treachery shall never endanger us again to do. "(Dunkin, journalism after 9 / 11 review)

"This is vital reading today. At a time when hysteria is brewing beneath the surface, is Sandra Silberstein coolanalytical, highly readable – and healthy "
The Guardian, UK

• Summary:

The book's introduction is an imaginary window Silberstein, drawn, by which it shows as an applied linguist, that helped as "words a lot of things happen." (XIII) and also "how language can be used to make national policies …."( xiii)

From the introduction can be interpreted, requires that the writer feels on her shoulder, like a person born in New York to explain about the events thatoccurred on 11 September 2001 not only on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, but also affected American national identity under attack.

In the first chapter tries Sandra Silberstein, discuss in detail how to build a nation at war. To obtain their goal of a writer in the second chapter focuses on all speeches and statements by President George W. Bush made in the first moments after the terrorist attacks, changed his position as president, "the candidate with theperfect bloodlines [who came] the office under allegations that his presidency was a bastard, sired not by voters but by the courts "(p.40) to an American hero. The writer compares Bush speeches on the statements of President Roosevelt in the history of Pearl Harbor.

In chapter 3, which is the language of the book Silberstein focuses on the testimonies tried, "the role of television in the creation of September 11 stories and the establishment of socialIdentities. "(P. 61) by credit welcoming two linguistic tools:" The methodical analysis of News Discourse by Ron Scollon, the standards of the TV coverage issue, and the oral narrative structure of William Labov, the narratives observed as an eyewitness to the production of news of entertainment. "(He Xuelin, 2003)

She also stressed on skills of journalists in the definition of the events that had unfolded at Ground Zero. For example, in one of the interviews, journalistasked one witness the following questions: "Was there screaming? Was there violence? Was it scary? Are you scared?" Do you have people bleeding? " (P.79-80).

The book, in Chapter 4 also shows that, like New York to convert America (n) and Rudy Giuliani, an "America's Mayor" by exploring the rhetorical reconstruction in American culture in post-9/11.

By Chapter 5, "Selling America" and Chapter 6 "The New McCarthyism", turns the patriotism as aIssue. In the former chapter Silberstein ads analyzed in the context of the ongoing terrorist attacks, revealing that mourn in post-9/11 American people supported the government and showed their patriotism by shopping like the way lost to their fellow countrymen.

In the latter one, the author criticizes the emergence of McCarthyism, which can be exaggerating patriotism post-9/11. According to their opinion was of the ACTA, the "cultural wars" to a new level, transforming a "warthe words "to the" war on words "by the publication of 100 examples of unpleasant voices of American universities.

The next chapter is a comparative study on the ABC documentary, "The Minefield: The United States and the Muslim Word," by Peter Jennings and CNN documentary on Islam by Christiane Amanpour. Although in a former documentary Islam is a global problem, try the latter to the clashes between the two types of cultures to be avoided. "For the vast majority of Muslims, the terroristAttacks on the United States was a violation of the teachings of Islam. "(P. 155)

"Despite the claims of the militants," nothing justifies the Koran, the Islamic holy book, this kind of crime against humanity. … In fact, the Koran forbids suicide. "(P. 155)

And the final chapter, Chapter 8, deals with the new series of rhetorical transformations of the second anniversary, and then follows the march of civil discourse from New York to Baghdad. In this part of the book the authorextends to the war in Iraq and accusations against the U.S. president and former heroes for their mendacity.

Advertisements

English National Language: Our shows senators their racist prejudices

November 13, 2009

English National Language: Our shows senators their racist prejudices

When the English were as our national language, why not make it as our ancestors? Maybe it was because they recognized that immigration brought in people from foreign countries and that the English language would take care of themselves.

Danes, Swedes, Poles, Italians, German, French, Russians, Jews from many countries, and the Irish came to our country. It descendants now speak English. Yes, afew Italians are bilingual, but in most cases, English is the language.

I spent a few years ago, the herding a flock of Spanish-speaking Mormons in Atlantic City. I noticed that said those who were in the country, the longest of the best English and their children in English. It's just a matter of time, in our environment, that is the language for a Spanish-speaking families English.

Here in Idaho, where we have many Spanish-speaking people that I'm justchange the language again. When I say "Como esta?" Say, "I often find answers:
"I'm fine. How are you?"

The Spanish-speaking people want to speak English and they love to show their skills. It is true that the older a person is, the harder it is to learn a new language. Some experts say that the ability to quickly learn a foreign language diminishes after the age of twenty-five years. I am sure this applies to most people. Only old people do not learn herethe English language.

In Europe, people often speak English and the languages of their neighbors. I went to a restaurant in Luxembourg late one evening and I was welcomed in French, German, English, and then before I could return an answer.

In Norway, I was on a tour of Viking artifacts and the guide speaks Italian, German, met English, Spanish, Norwegian, and their homeland. Language is not a big deal among the civilized nations. In Japan, English is widely spoken as in Hollandand most European countries. Why we do not speak French and Spanish? Colorado has been teaching children in kindergarten begin to year, but Colorado is an exception.

Creation of a state language of the law, if one already exists is only a pup practice presents youthful prejudice. If our senators have a brain between them, they would find the emphasis on the public debt, the trade deficit, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden.

Poland,Italians, Russians, Jews, Africans, and the Mexican have so far only in low esteem in this country at different times. Some of these groups have some of the stigma, the loss brought them small-minded guys who lurk but for the most part, still prejudice. The American Indian was regarded as subhuman view of many Americans for decades. Some still do. Such feelings of sadness, arrogance and bloodshed. Race riots have not been eliminated in the United States. It seems that the Senatedoing everything possible to create a new one.

Immigration is a fact of life in our world. Many people had been displaced after the Second World War. Migrant workers are a fact of life in Europe and they are a fact of life in the United States. We need these workers, the work we do not want to do. In Idaho, the economy would shutdown without these workers who work hard and for long hours. When I see the dairy and irrigation workers from playing football (soccer), having spent a very long timeDay of hard work, I am amazed at their endurance. I know that a good portion of the money they earn each day goes back to their families in Mexico, Central America, and South America.

I said in another article that this is a form of development assistance. The difference is that the immigrants have come here and work to get it. I think this is better than just sending money across the border, which would never get over the fat hands of foreign bureaucrats.

We must control our borders. I do not knowYou have a problem with it. I do not understand why we did not get an agreement with Mexico and other countries, the immigration of workers into an organized and efficient process. There should be a way for many of these workers to become citizens. We need them as much as we need immigrants during the early development of our country. If they are citizens, they stand a better chance to serve the country have to fight our wars, and teaches us some good manners.

The president is on the right sideTitle with immigration. He is not the greatest thinkers of the world, that he never details of his plans. But we have to assist him in resolving this issue with care and understanding, and according to our laws.

The world has taken a place. Move over!

The End

Immigration, Bush, Mexico, Jews, Poles, Italians, the Senate, National, Language, English, tolerance, Spanish

Copyright © 2006 John T. Jones, Ph.D.